CNN Republican Debate: Crowd Has to BEG Moderators to Ask Ron Paul a Question

It just couldn't be that Ron Paul is as crazy and irrelevantas ever now could it?

It just couldn't be that Ron Paul is as crazy and irrelevantas ever now could it?

No actually, it couldn't. The global hegemony only wants you to think so and are using their media, both main stream and "alternative", to spread that message. He is the only one who makes any sense whatsoever of any of the presidential hopefuls including the sitting incumbent. There is not one thing crazy about his message, one of natural rights and responsibilities vs. victimhood and dependency. It is the message of real hope and change, the change America needs.

Lisa, I believe you are onto something here, Ron Paul is being terrorized by the media and folks that only think he is a crazy and irrelevant and the real problem as I see it is someone very high up isn't going to allow Ron Paul to be elected. I say to that ............LISTEN to Ron Paul, look at the history of things that happened that make our foreign policies of the past haunt us. Why do we have a problem with Iran? The United States of America is the biggest terrorist on this planet we call Earth thanks to the many politicians and financers of those wars for PROFIT. All the American people have gotten are dead Sons and Fathers. It's time to stop the nonsense of the government. AT LEAST get the education that Ron Paul is trying to give us all. There isn't a chance in hell the people will be allowed to elect him. And I'm not so sure we want another assasinated President as the Federal Reserve wouldn't have Ron Paul putting them out of business.

I think people will see how wrong they were come about 2015. I hope the revolution comes when I am still alive....i do not want to miss it.....and I want to be there for my family.

that is the one thing i hope for ...an intellectual revolution in this country towards freedom.

The problem is, there are too many idiots who are allowed to vote who will actually believe that statement.

This is how I see it.

I like Ron Paul. I like his platform, and I think he's just radical enough to do the radical things we need to get this country back on track. But then again, I'm kinda radical myself.

The problem is, Paul has a radical reputation with the public. At the very beginning, people didn't take him seriously. In fact, the GOP was gearing up for a Paul win in Iowa by saying it wouldn't mean anything, that it would be a fluke. Any one else could win it and it would be a forecast, except Paul. That kinda pissed me off.

So while I like Paul, and would actually vote for him against Obama, I'm afraid he is not electable. And what we need is someone who is electable. That leaves the other three.

Romney is Obama-lite. I'm borrowing that from someone. He is too moderate to effect the actual change we need from the "change" of Obama. Not only that, but he will have a tough fight against Obama. Everyone knows from the media spin that he is the candidate they want to run against.

So that leaves us with Santorum and Gingrich. Both of them have pretty much the same platform. But Santorum doesn't have the experience that Gingrich does. And, Gingrich is so hated, it's obvious the Obama camp doesn't want to go up against him.

So while I like Paul, and would vote for him as the GOP candidate, I think Gingrich is more electable.

One big difference, Ron Paul is unelectable. Or to put it another way he is as electable as Ross Perot was.

Like I said Paul is electable as Perot was.

No I would not. Off the top of my head: I think some of his ideas appear to be good on the surface but fail miserably when looking at the entire picture. I don't agree with his racist newsletters ,and I oppose his stance on regulations because as long as humans are involved regulations are necessary. His idea of getting rid of getting rid of the department of education, energy and the EPA could be catastrophic for our country and our environment. And I vehemently oppose his stance on the uninsured; we are better than that in the US and we don't let someone die when they get sick because they chose not to buy insurance. Actually he is quite radical in his beliefs.

Good Debate!

Actually he is quite radical in his beliefs.

I tend to agree with that. What I was trying to say earlier is that radical is what we need to change course. I have no faith that if he were elected all of his radical ideas would come to pass. We are supposed to have a check and balance system of government (although the last two and maybe more administrations have trounced all over that). He would need complete support of the Congress to effect all of his changes. I don't see that happening, unless America pulls their collective heads out of their collective asses and gets rid of the DC establishment.

But if he were elected, some things would change, I believe. I think we would not see a debt ceiling getting raised every few months. I think he would not put up with interim budgets, and would not be afraid of telling the government to shut down because pansy Congressmen can't get funding approved for pet projects in the federal budget.

Those are the radical things I would like to see.

BUT if you are only worried about Paul becuase he will ACTUALLY do it, and you are okay with Obama because you know he says stuff and doesn't do it....then I understand. :)

Nop....., guess you don't understand what I was saying.

Merging those agencies in order to eliminate duplicity is a sound decision. Mothballing 5 agencies is radical and would not be in the best interest of the country or most Americans. It would however benefit the 1% because at the expense of the middle class and those working to reach it.

so how is Ron Paul "extreme" and Obama is not for "taking" Ron Paul idea?

roflmao. Everybody knows that their plans are not the same; not even close. But nice try.

...Obama is giving false hope again

that's right you did not get your bail out..............

teresa

please tell me the function of the department of education.

look it up.

you are the one stating that it would be our best interest to keep it.....lets hear what its vital function??? especially since it hasnt been around that long...and especially since before it was created we were leading the world...and since its creation we have slowly fallen down the ladder in education.

Please I would really love to know what it actually does besides bring our country down...as all evidence shows.

Marshall James:

please tell me the function of the department of education.

National consistency of brainwashing kids to grow up believing that it's patriotic to sit down and shut up when people in "authority" (i.e. the banking class and its minions) tell you to do things that make no sense, hurt your own interests, or offend your sensibilities.

yes no independent thought or diversity...just robotic clones....all the same.

gozo unlimited had a great article with video on this about a week ago....an interview with reggie middleton...did you catch that one??

eye roll x 3

Marshall James:

gozo unlimited had a great article with video on this about a week ago....an interview with reggie middleton...did you catch that one??

No. But I'll check it out.

Thanks.

teresa:

eye roll x 3

Perhaps, if your eyes weren't so busy rolling around inside your head, you'd see more of what's actually going on outside your head.

Just a suggestion.

ouch!